從魯曼與拉崗的觀點探討醫病關係中認同的生成與流變

學年度:92
學期:2
校院:東吳大學
系所:社會學系碩士班
論文名稱(中):從魯曼與拉崗的觀點探討醫病關係中認同的生成與流變
論文名稱(英):Research on the Vicissitudes of Identity within the Analytic Relationship from the Viewpoints of Luhmann and Lacan
學位類別:碩士
語文別:chi
學號:90315004
頁數:109
研究生姓名(中):黃信洋
研究生姓名(英): Huang Shinn-Young
指導教授姓名(中):蔡錦昌
指導教授姓名(英):Choi, kam-cheong
關鍵字(中):認同、自我指涉、 自我再生、 四種論述、 醫病關係、 雙重欺騙、 雙重偶變性、 互為主體性
關鍵字(英):identity、 self-reference、 autopoeisis、 the four discourses、 the analytic relationship、 double deception、 double contingency、 intersubjectivity


中文提要:

  本文主旨在於解析認同生成流變之源由,所採用的主要分析概念則是魯曼與拉崗的理論。第一章使用魯曼與拉崗各七個主要概念來解釋認同的變換,概略敘述認同與各該概念之間的關聯。第二章主要是由魯曼的論點來探究「人性」的歷史成因,進一步闡釋主體性出現的複雜因素,最終論證主體之所以無法獲取穩固認同的主要原因。第三章的論述焦點由主體過渡至社會,透過分析拉崗著名的四種論述來解釋溝通與認同的關聯。最後一章則由雙重欺騙(拉崗論點)與雙重偶變(魯曼論點)論證「真實的」認同將永不可得,而人們的認同永將擺脫不了不停生成流變的命運。

英文提要:

  This treatise aims at explaining the reasons of identity’s vicissitudes, taking Luhmann’s and Lacan’s theory as the main conceptual tools. The first chapter tries to explain identity’s transformation with both Luhmann’s and Lacan’s seven concepts, and summarizes each concept’s relationship with identity. The second chapter deals with the factors of “humanity’s” historical formation, explicates those complicated reasons of “subjectivity’s” emergence, and finally gives the reasons why the subject cannot have ultimate identity. The third chapter’s focus is displaced from the subject to the social. With the interpretation of Lacan’s famous theory of the four discourses, we can clearly explicate the relevance between communication and identity. The last chapter concludes with the theories of double deception (Lacan’s theory) and double contingency (Luhmann’s theory) that the “real” identity will never appear, and people’s identities will never get rid of the doomed non-stopping vicissitudes.